Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Has the deliberative model of democracy an epistemic value?
Has the Deliberative Model of Democracy an epistemic value?
| dc.creator | García, Roberto | |
| dc.date | 2013-07-17 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-24T17:39:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-03-24T17:39:12Z | |
| dc.identifier | https://journal.poligran.edu.co/index.php/panorama/article/view/367 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.15765/pnrm.v7i12.367 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10823/5338 | |
| dc.description | Deliberative democracy is a normative ideal of democracy. This model is a proposal for the regeneration of the legitimacy of our institutions, but also a mechanism for decision making. It is based on two different dimensions: a procedural dimension where the model demands the inclusion and an equal capacity to influence the final decision of all those affected (Cohen, 1989; Bohman, 1996; Habermas, 1992 ...) and a substantive dimension where the political decisions are made through a collective procedure of argumentation and public discussion. If these conditions are recognized, the decisions will be more rational and better decisions. This paper has two aims. First I will present the key elements of this epistemic conception of political legitimacy. Second I will show the challenges it faces. On a one hand, the counterfactual of many of its postulates and on the other, the obvious problems of bias consensualist of this model. | en-US |
| dc.description | Deliberative democracy is a normative ideal of democracy. This model is a proposal for the regeneration of the legitimacy of our institutions, but also a mechanism for decision making. It is based on two different dimensions: a procedural dimension where the model demands the inclusion and an equal capacity to influence the final decision of all those affected (Cohen, 1989; Bohman, 1996; Habermas, 1992 ...) and a substantive dimension where the political decisions are made through a collective procedure of argumentation and public discussion. If these conditions are recognized, the decisions will be more rational and better decisions. This paper has two aims. First I will present the key elements of this epistemic conception of political legitimacy. Second I will show the challenges it faces. On a one hand, the counterfactual of many of its postulates and on the other, the obvious problems of bias consensualist of this model. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Institución Universitaria Politécnico Grancolombiano - Editorial | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://journal.poligran.edu.co/index.php/panorama/article/view/367/346 | |
| dc.source | Panorama; Vol. 7 No. 12 (2013): Panorama 12; 23-37 | en-US |
| dc.source | Panorama; Vol. 7 Núm. 12 (2013): Panorama 12; 23-37 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Panorama; v. 7 n. 12 (2013): Panorama 12; 23-37 | pt-BR |
| dc.source | 2145-308X | |
| dc.source | 1909-7433 | |
| dc.source | 10.15765/pnrm.v7i12 | |
| dc.title | Has the deliberative model of democracy an epistemic value? | en-US |
| dc.title | Has the Deliberative Model of Democracy an epistemic value? | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dc.type | Peer-reviewed article | en-US |
| dc.type | Artículo evaluado por pares | es-ES |
Ficheros en el ítem
| Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
|---|---|---|---|
|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |
|||
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
-
Panorama [303]
Revista semestral especializada en Educación y ELearning