Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Has the Deliberative Model of Democracy an epistemic value?

dc.creatorGarcía, Roberto
dc.date2013-07-17
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-24T17:39:12Z
dc.date.available2022-03-24T17:39:12Z
dc.identifierhttps://journal.poligran.edu.co/index.php/panorama/article/view/367
dc.identifier10.15765/pnrm.v7i12.367
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10823/5338
dc.descriptionDeliberative democracy is a normative ideal of democracy. This model is a proposal for the regeneration of the legitimacy of our institutions, but also a mechanism for decision making. It is based on two different dimensions: a procedural dimension where the model demands the inclusion and an equal capacity to influence the final decision of all those affected (Cohen, 1989; Bohman, 1996; Habermas, 1992 ...) and a substantive dimension where the political decisions are made through a collective procedure of argumentation and public discussion. If these conditions are recognized, the decisions will be more rational and better decisions. This paper has two aims. First I will present the key elements of this epistemic conception of political legitimacy. Second I will show the challenges it faces. On a one hand, the counterfactual of many of its postulates and on the other, the obvious problems of bias consensualist of this model.en-US
dc.descriptionDeliberative democracy is a normative ideal of democracy. This model is a proposal for the regeneration of the legitimacy of our institutions, but also a mechanism for decision making. It is based on two different dimensions: a procedural dimension where the model demands the inclusion and an equal capacity to influence the final decision of all those affected (Cohen, 1989; Bohman, 1996; Habermas, 1992 ...) and a substantive dimension where the political decisions are made through a collective procedure of argumentation and public discussion. If these conditions are recognized, the decisions will be more rational and better decisions. This paper has two aims. First I will present the key elements of this epistemic conception of political legitimacy. Second I will show the challenges it faces. On a one hand, the counterfactual of many of its postulates and on the other, the obvious problems of bias consensualist of this model.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherInstitución Universitaria Politécnico Grancolombiano - Editoriales-ES
dc.relationhttps://journal.poligran.edu.co/index.php/panorama/article/view/367/346
dc.sourcePanorama; Vol. 7 No. 12 (2013): Panorama 12; 23-37en-US
dc.sourcePanorama; Vol. 7 Núm. 12 (2013): Panorama 12; 23-37es-ES
dc.sourcePanorama; v. 7 n. 12 (2013): Panorama 12; 23-37pt-BR
dc.source2145-308X
dc.source1909-7433
dc.source10.15765/pnrm.v7i12
dc.titleHas the deliberative model of democracy an epistemic value?en-US
dc.titleHas the Deliberative Model of Democracy an epistemic value?es-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typePeer-reviewed articleen-US
dc.typeArtículo evaluado por pareses-ES


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Panorama [303]
    Revista semestral especializada en Educación y ELearning

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem